<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://arcade.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>moral truths</title>
 <link>http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/moral-truths</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en-ac</language>
<item>
 <title>On Moral Truths</title>
 <link>http://arcade.stanford.edu/moral-truths</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As I am about to criticize the idea of &amp;quot;moral truth&amp;quot; in the paragraphs that follow, let me begin by saying that I am not defending moral relativism. As Sam Harris points out in his recent book, &lt;i&gt;The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Moral Values&lt;/i&gt;, &amp;quot;one can reasonably doubt whether any consistent moral relativist has ever existed.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arcade.stanford.edu/moral-truths&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://arcade.stanford.edu/moral-truths#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/moral-landscape">moral landscape</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/moral-truths">moral truths</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/relativism">relativism</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/sam-harris">Sam Harris</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://arcade.stanford.edu/crss/node/988</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:30:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>William Egginton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">988 at http://arcade.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
