<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://arcade.stanford.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>catalogue poems</title>
 <link>http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/catalogue-poems</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en-ac</language>
<item>
 <title>Lists, stars</title>
 <link>http://arcade.stanford.edu/lists-stars</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been reading the &lt;a href=&quot;/against-narrative-iii-or-certain-kind-of-narratives&quot;&gt;evolving&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-narrative&quot;&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; on narrativity here with great interest: Kate Lingley&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;/defense-of-diachronic-possibly-not-of-narrativity&quot;&gt;recent post&lt;/a&gt; on the value (perhaps necessity) of a diachronic way of organizing the meanings with which art is invested particularly resonated, since this is a significant problem in Anglo-Saxon literature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arcade.stanford.edu/lists-stars&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://arcade.stanford.edu/lists-stars#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/catalogue-poems">catalogue poems</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/genre">Genre</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/lists">lists</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/narrativity">narrativity</category>
 <category domain="http://arcade.stanford.edu/category/tags/old-english">Old English</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://arcade.stanford.edu/crss/node/731</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:34:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Emily Thornbury</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">731 at http://arcade.stanford.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
